NAV BAR

HOMEPHOTOSABOUT

Showing posts with label Mark Webber. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Webber. Show all posts

Monday, December 10, 2012

Flat-12 Top Ten

Based solely upon the last three Grands Prix (Abu Dhabi, USA, Brazil), I'd bet that the 2012 F1 season could be safely typeset into almanacs and encyclopedias two decades from now as a remarkable year.     2012 delivered a lot of surprises, and one of the greatest ironies is that two of the best races occurred at Valencia and Abu Dhabi, circuits most commonly regarded for producing boring processions.  

With the season now complete and Sebastian Vettel claiming his third straight world driving title, the time has come once again for armchair analysis.

Enter the 2012 edition of the Flat-12 Top Ten.   A highly subjective, passionate summary utilizing the latest time proven techniques (beer) to measure the following criteria:  level of performance, consistency of performance, ability to overcome adversity (in terms of car, weather, etc.), and avoiding mistakes.

There's a lot of time wasted on compiling such useless lists, but sit back, grab those beer goggles, and join in with your own amateur punditry.

Anyway, I'm linking this post to the Torque F1 Top Ten, for an alternate, perhaps less "hoppy" perspective.  

1) Fernando Alonso

I've been following F1 a long time.     A real long time.    I can identify world champions who conquered even when they did not have the best car before I can tie my shoes.  

Lauda in 1977, Piquet in 1981, Senna in 1991, and Raikkonen in 2007 are but a few who come immediately to mind.    There were non-champion drivers such as Villeneuve who toiled bravely with the wretched 1981 Ferrari 126CK, Senna literally willing pole position at Imola from his schizo Williams prior that fateful day in 1994 . . .

Yet despite all prior examples of man over machinery I can quickly produce, I wonder if any driver at any time has overcome a car so wayward as the F2012 Ferrari to come so close to winning it all?  

Fernando is a better driver now than when he won back to back titles at Renault.     His race starts are unbelievable and his tenacity is absolute.    As with all great drivers he's made a few enemies along the way, but I have no doubt that Fernando Alonso put together the most complete performance of 2012.

Arguably Fernando made only one costly mistake all year long:   leaving Räikkönen no where to go into turn 1 at Suzuka.     Many also contend that his title was lost in the first corner melee at Spa.    Certainly, Spa was a race Alonso could have won and most certainly achieved a podium result, so the fact that he came away from both of these races empty handed is significant.  

However, if we allow that a couple of DNF's might be expected over a 20 race calendar, Monza may have inflicted the most subliminal damage.     Alonso was quickest all weekend, until Q3 . . . and although some doubt lingers over what actually happened, the loss of his expected pole position and almost certain victory hurt.    Further losing 2nd place and 3 points to Perez only added insult to injury.       

2)  Kimi Räikkönen

Räikkönen very nearly found himself leading the Driver's Championship one quarter of the way into the year.    The Lotus looked exceptionally quick at certain times, on certain circuits, but overall the car simply was not ready to run at the front.    Yet Kimi managed, much like Alonso, to turn mid field qualifying positions into podium finishes.     Räikkönen drove with great control all year long.     Fighting for position, he always did so with sublime precision, never once guilty of putting a competitor off, although many still blame him for Suzuka.     His pass on Schumacher into Eau Rouge, move around the outside of Di Resta through the twisty bits in Austin, and his final wheel to wheel exchange with Schumi at Interlagos are but several glorious displays of a driving prowess that F1 missed in 2010 and 2011.

It is for Kimi's consistency and phenomenal precision over the course of the entire season which stand foremost in my mind.

3)  Lewis Hamilton

I've long been a critic of Lewis Hamilton.   I never cared for his methods during his early days at McLaren and still feel that he threw Dave Ryan under the bus.   I always believed he was over-rated and possessed an uncanny knack to flatten brakes and blister tires.   However, times and people change.

Despite a rather uneven 2012 season, Lewis managed to pull it all together by season's end and very nearly won the last three Grands Prix in dominant fashion.    His drive in Austin was without doubt the most determined, disciplined performance of his career.

Hamilton suffered inexplicable pit stop debacles early in the year, and costly technical failures in the latter.     McLaren found themselves floundering mid-season, as demonstrated by their dreadful home race at Silverstone.  

Despite all of this, I took notice of Hamilton's newfound reserve.    His airborne hissy fits were greatly subdued if not all but gone by season's end.   In year's prior, atrocious pit stops would have left Hamilton gasping for someone's head over the team radio.   His off-track soap opera dramas, although taking a different form in terms of tweets, were in check and largely gone.

. . . and so are his days at McLaren.

I don't know what fortunes lie in wait for Lewis at Mercedes, but it's hard to fault his decision.    All one needs to do is take a stroll through the F1 Village at any Grand Prix to realize that McLaren demanded too much in restricting his ability to capitalize on the Lewis Hamilton brand.    My hats off to Lewis for making a tough decision . . . my guess is that he will find himself fighting to get into Q3 instead fighting for pole for much of 2013.
 
4)  Sebastian Vettel  

Although Sebastian Vettel held the narrowest of point margins as the teams began the European season, his 2012 was shaping up nothing like the casual romp he enjoyed in 2011.   He initially appeared to struggle, and was often out paced by his teammate.    However as the teams reached Hungary there were subtle indications that Vettel was back on form and on the rise.    Vettel's season actually began at Spa, the moment Alonso fell victim to Grosjean's crazy, hell bent start.  

Vettel and Red Bull emerged from the summer break ready to capitalize on the post European season and in doing so they cemented Seb's place in the history books.     In contrast to my thoughts on Hamilton, I'd long been a fan of Sebastian Vettel.    People and times do certainly change.  It's fair to say that my growing appreciation for Lewis Hamilton in 2012 was balanced by my growing depreciation for Sebastian Vettel.

The truth of the matter is Vettel remains an exceptional talent, certainly one of the best.    Although questions regarding his abilities to fight from behind have been fairly drawn, he has in my mind adequately demonstrated himself to be very much a complete driver.  

Unfortunately, the more I get to know Seb, the less I like him.    Dare I suggest he's growing overly arrogant and borderline obnoxious?   IMHO, He carries two demons on his shoulder like a poster child for the unwitting:  

The first of which has been his abnormal good fortune.   Vettel has enjoyed not just run of the mill good luck, but instead the sort of fortune the universe does not dole out very often, nor indefinitely.   Vettel is riding a wave that is eventually going to have a fairly hard, rapid crash.

The second demon is Seb's ego.    All of this good fortune has gone to his head.   From my vantage point he does not quite see reality.    Granted, we all can have difficulty seeing our paths objectively, and among us F1 drivers generally tend to be a bit more ego-centric.  Unfortunately, a heady, over inflated self image can betray one's focus and determination, and if Seb can't keep his in check he may soon realize his own zenith to be fleeting.

A fair perspective would recognize that Vettel drove great in Abu Dhabi, but his ascent to the podium was primarily the result of an unusually large number of reasonable foes falling victim to retirement or repair.   (It is also no secret that Vettel enjoys a slight advantage also having two Toro Rosso's who will always jump out of his way).

A fair perspective would acknowledge that he was incredibly lucky to have not retired at Interlagos from the first lap accident of his own making.     Yes, I'm sure there is debate over "own making;" I'd be happy to engage that topic in follow up comments.

In both instances, Seb did well to recover . . . but strictly speaking his performance level has been over blown to mythical proportions.    Let's not forget that his Interlagos recovery included those same Toro Rosso's and a parting gift from Michael Schumacher, who apparently must not have been anticipating a post retirement career at Ferrari.

Am I unfair?     Hardly.   Vettel is a rare talent.   Is he head and shoulders above Alonso, Räikkönen, Hamilton?    No.   Did he earn the 2012 Driver's Title?    Yes.   He is a deserved World Champion.    Did he merit that title above all others?   No, but championships often go that way.  

He is the 2012 World Driving Champion, the youngest three time champion ever, and I congratulate him for his historical achievement.

5)  Nico Hulkenberg

The strongest statement I can make about Nico Hulkenberg is Paul di Resta.    A formidable talent, di Resta looked the stronger of the Force India pair over the early part of the year, but much like Vettel, Hulkenberg sprung to life gaining a career best 4th place at Spa followed by a good run of points finishes in the post European fly away season.   He won the BBC "Overtake of the Year" award for his move past Grosjean & Hamilton in Korea.    His charge to the lead in the wet Brazil conditions was spectacular, albeit cut short by clashing with Hamilton into the Senna "S."

Hulkenberg eclipsed di Resta (originally rumored as headed to McLaren) in silly season prognostication.   As Perez emerged as Hamilton's McLaren successor, many suggested that they should have instead chosen Hulkenberg instead.     Ironic indeed, as it was as if Paul di Resta had never been in the frame for the seat.

Hulkenberg jumps to Sauber for 2013, and I expect him to do quite well.

6)  Jenson Button

Jenson had an up and down year, and lands sixth on my list primarily due to that inconsistency.    He had a number of magnificent drives, the sort many have to come to expect given his highly disciplined race craft.    Button usually excels in changeable conditions, therefore his dominance in a very dry, very clear Belgian Grand Prix was surprising.    So strong was Jenson at Spa that I'm not certain, had Hamilton and Alonso survived the first corner, that they could have caught him on that day.

Jenson now clearly leads McLaren into 2013.    I believe that his maturity, race craft, and calm demeanor will serve McLaren well . . . but all of these will be pale if Jenson can not find consistent pace at the front.    He's got a huge challenge ahead, but may also have the best car on the grid.

We've seen what can happen when Jenson has such a car.

7)  Sergio Perez    

Sergio had moments of brilliance.    Malaysia was in fact one of those classic F1 "arrival" moments, where a driver graduates into the realm of potential greatness.     Sergio also performed exceedingly well taking 2nd (and potentially the title) from Alonso at Monza, earning Niki Lauda's admiration in the process.

Unfortunately, Perez then struggled following his strong showing in Italy and the announcement of his move to McLaren.   Races such as Brazil (unfortunate victim) Abu Dhabi (unfortunate perpetrator) are best forgotten.     His final point for 2012 and for Sauber came with a less than impressive 10th place in Singapore.     Singapore?    In hindsight, that is almost unbelievable.

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how Sergio goes at McLaren.    I believe the potential for greatness in Perez remains strong, but the realization will be dependent upon his stock of this year's lessons.     He appears to be a master at preserving his tires . . . and if he can tie all the loose ends together around that rare skill, he could grow to become unbeatable with the right team.  

8)  Nico Rosberg

At the moment Nico captured his first F1 victory in Shanghai, it appeared that Mercedes had indeed come into 2012 a contender.    Unfortunately, that contention seemed to evaporate almost immediately afterwards.

Nico remains a difficult talent to judge, however I believe that his slight edge over Schumacher during their three years as teammates is significant.      I strongly suspect that Hamilton has a surprise waiting at Mercedes; he will find Nico a hard teammate to beat.

Mercedes as a team are equally difficult to pin down.   They more closely resemble their former iteration as Honda than the singular success of 2009 under the title winning moniker of Brawn GP.

One can only imagine what factors contribute to this, but until Nico Rosberg lands within a truly competitive environment, I'm not sure we'll know much more about his true potential either.

9)   Felipe Massa

Felipe gets major kudos for his startling, sensational return to form.      For a driver whose career looked finished . . . seriously beyond hope . . . the manner in which Massa finally recovered to discover faster pace than his title contending teammate begs recognition.

Massa's driving in the opening laps at Interlagos was outstanding.    The manner in which he and Alonso worked off each other against Webber was something to behold.    

Ferrari have stuck by Felipe over difficult times.   Accordingly, he has played the team role in return.     It will be very interesting to see how 2013 plays out within the Scuderia if he continues to improve.

10)   Mark Webber  

Webber looked stronger than ever, and arguably worse than ever, all in one season.

On all counts he should place higher on my list than 10th, but the pitfalls of 2012 were so drastic he almost did not make the list at all.

His victories at Silverstone and Monaco were well deserved.     He took advantage of Alonso's tire woes to mount victory charge worthy of the year end highlight reel.     He capitalized on Michael Schumacher's grid penalty to turn an inherited pole position grid slot into an almost uncontested victory.
Unfortunately, Singapore and Abu Dhabi contrast sharply, and his drive in Abu Dhabi might qualify as the one of the worst by any driver all year long.

He had a fair number of characteristically bad starts . . . I've often suggested that he needs to quit focusing on his post retirement broadcast career, but if Mark didn't talk to Brundle, Buxton, or Coulthard, I'm not sure who would.

Webber is one of the good guys, a real benefit to the sport, and I'm hoping that he ultimately enjoys the success he deserves.    Conversely, I'm cynical enough to know that won't happen at Red Bull.


 Elsewhere along the grid . . .

Pastor Maldonado scored an impressive first victory in Spain, but I found his overall performance in what looked to be a fairly competitive Williams disappointing.  

Paul di Resta struggled, although I would imagine his results don't properly reflect his resolve . . .

Kobayashi had moments . . . he drove very well under pressure to hold off a quickly closing Button at Suzuka to take his very first podium in his home race . . . a real highlight of the season.  

Grosjean showed remarkable pace and had he kept things a bit more tidy (understatement), I would've have acknowledged that potential above.

Schumacher set the fastest quail time for Monaco and scored the only podium result of his return in Valencia, but was never really in contention, and not really a candidate for top ten consideration.    More thoughts here.

Finally, there are some drivers I just don't have a strong enough grasp for when compiling such summaries . . . Ricciardo, Kovalainen, Glock, Petrov.

With this 20 race season wrapping so late into the year, 2013 is just around the corner.    I suspect that things will not change remarkably over the coming 12 months.  

McLaren will probably have, generally speaking, the fastest car but will need to address their reliability issues.    Red Bull will remain without doubt the strongest team on the grid.    Ferrari will probably continue to struggle with tires.    Lotus?   Williams?   Sauber?  

2013 will bring Bottas (Williams), Gutierrez(Sauber), and potentially other new faces.   Sadly we may lose Kobayashi and Kovalainen.    Petrov's future is also far from certain.     HRT is gone and perhaps, too, are de la Rosa and Kartikeyan.     I'm concerned that the pay driver syndrome is taking a firmer grip on the sport.

The tables won't truly be turned upside down until the rules changes of 2014, which will introduce new, V-6 Turbo power plants.       

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

British Grand Prix

When I think about all of the colorful and many times laughable characters who have populated the F1 paddock since the mid-70's, I doubt those new to the sport are being treated to the same level of entertainment that the crustier among us may have become accustomed.

As Bernie transformed F1 from a gentleman's pursuit to big business, we should have expected to see teams run by marketing companies and masters of business administration.  Heck it happened to the movie business, why not F1?  

Thus the Silverstone squabble between Christian Horner and Martin Whitmarsh was hardly the most exciting thing we've seen, and regardless of blame being simultaneously directed toward Red Bull, the FIA, and Ferrari(!), I found the entire debacle a snoozer.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure both are great gentlemen.    Horner brings many years in motor sport from his days as a driver, and Whitmarsh is a highly educated engineer.    Unlike this blogger, they are true insiders with many years dedicated to motor sport as a profession.

Unfortunately Horner is also charged as the mouth piece and primary corporate communications entity for a team that exists as result of a massive brand marketing strategy.   Red Bull is nothing if it is not a marketing enterprise, and probably one of the more ingenious at that.  

As so eloquently described here, service to such corporate interests requires one being able to speak fluently out of both sides of their mouth.    Christian Horner has perfected that art, and Mark Webber truly deserves better.

Fernando Alonso once again demonstrated why he is largely regarded as the best driver on the grid.     His performance was measured, controlled, and as one might have overheard at Silverstone, brilliant.

He bided his time, turning on the after burners when it counted.     Considering the diverse skill set that a driver must draw upon to be successful in F1, Alonso continues to demonstrate that his is the complete package.

Overall, the race served up plenty of great moments.     The pendulum swung around between Red Bull, Ferrari, and McLaren until everything started to go awry for the home team.     I really had to feel for the McLaren faithful who must have been "gutted" after being so close to witnessing a victory on home soil.  

Aside from Valencia and despite Vettel's almost insurmountable grasp on the championship, 2011 has been another great season.     It's hard to believe that we are scarcely half way through the calendar.

My guess it that it's going to be a fantastic run from here to Interlagos.





 

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Round 4: Great race, but . . .

In the space of three weeks and two highly volatile Grands Prix, my concern regarding the new state of F1 may have been justified at Istanbul.  

IMHO this season's recipe is an over correction.    Grands Prix previously sedated by the artificial restriction aerodynamics wrought against wheel-to -wheel combat now look vulnerable to staging a new artificiality.    Almost in an instant we've flipped from the hapless guy behind to the defenseless guy in front.   Turnpike, interstate-style overtaking is too close to becoming the new vogue and modus operandi in F1.

Prior the start of 2009, the FIA implemented the directives of the "Overtaking Working Group," a collection of influential FOTA members assembled to alleviate the numbing effect of aerodynamic technology upon the sport.

The cars were redesigned with smaller rear wings, smaller front tires, and bigger front wings to greatly reduce turbulent wake, improve front grip, and increase competition.   Winglets and additional aero aids were outlawed.    In theory, all should have provided the car behind an aerodynamically stable environment in which to attack the car ahead.  

There was just one problem.   Typical of F1's on-going political warfare, a couple of the slicker players discovered and exploited a loophole in the new regulations which allowed the use of super diffusers.  

The turbulence produced by these ground sucking vacuums proved that neither the teams nor the fans had gained much of anything from the zillions spent reshaping wings and cutting winglets.    Wing and tire sizes were insignificant in comparison to the ground effect advantage diffusers were known to insure.

Expensive wind tunnels may prove to be the legacy of F1's manufacturer era, but it remains striking that simple aerodynamic regulation has proven so difficult to implement with temperance.

I contend that not all of what we witnessed at Istanbul was good for the sport.    Webber's relieving Alonso from 2nd place was simply too easy.   That is but one example.  We need close racing where neither the attacker nor defender carry a handicap.

No single DRS element alone handicaps an opponent.   It appears only that when combined with tires that degrade at exaggerated rate and frequency do we see some drivers at certain times as defenseless we did approaching Turn 12 in Turkey.

F1 is on the right course.   There were plenty of dramatic moments outside of the DRS zone.    Within that zone, there were battles enabled by the 2011 mix which weren't rendered completely false in the process.

It might just be that 2011's formula for overtaking may need a simple tweak . . .


Mark Webber's still talking about it.  

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Shanghaied?

This past Sunday in Shanghai was significant.    I suspect it may be looked back upon as the day F1 changed forever.

Those who have passionately followed the sport for decades have witnessed a fairly straight forward "formula" evolve into a politically charged enterprise that brings more annual legal revisions than the US Congress.

In recent years, we've become accustomed to each new season bringing a raft of new revisions to that formula.  Some stick . . . some don't, passing into obscurity under the tireless tinkering with what I might contend wasn't broke to begin with.

However, following three Grands Prix into the 2011 rule book, quickly obsolete tire compounds and a DRS enabled spectacle in China, F1 has crossed into a place from which it can no longer return . . . and I wonder what this means?

Don't get me wrong, I thought the Chinese Grand Prix was fantastic.  Regardless the loss of Bahrain, F1 2011 felt like ages in the making.   Australia was fantastic, as was Malaysia.   I'd bet the only real fear anyone had going into Shanghai was just how quickly Vettel would run away with it all.

I've personally voiced concern that F1's rules makers have grown too reactionary.    Heck I'm so old school that I still have never found a truly legitimate reason to drop the original points system of 9-6-4-3-2-1.    IMHO, it remains the perfect mathematical representation of each finishing position to the rest of the field . . . and every single iteration from that has been a digression.

Oh well.

Take a look at the attached BBC Post Race snippet.

Is Webber suggesting that the fight we witnessed in Shanghai was not real?  Is he merely playing the humble sportsman downplaying the significance of his drive through the field from 18th place?

Regarding the age old complaint over the lack of overtaking which gave us Shanghai 2011, I counter that F1 rarely makes the 6 o'clock news because it requires an appreciation born from dedication to sublime skill over slick, manipulated . . . at times scripted . . . entertainment.

Following F1 has always inspired my imagination.   As a result I've developed a suspicion that those like myself who watch from the infield may not truly experience what it is like to fight for position, wheel to wheel.

The seductress is speed, at once portending the starring role yet potentially spoiling the plot as inconsequential.    It marvels those who witness, but ultimately requires patient command from those who practice its craft.     I might argue that F1 drivers are ironically the most patient beings on the planet.

As a result, the occasional late braking maneuver of year's past was rarely casual, and I wonder if the specular shine of quickly degrading tires and DRS will  fade into the everyday ho-hum of instant gratification.

The often outspoken and controversial F1 legend Niki Lauda previously referred to DRS as the "most stupid idea."  

For now, I'm glad it's here, however I think time will tell whether Lauda and Webber are onto something.